- Home
- The Embassy
-
Consular Services
- Visa Services
- Registration of Indian Nationals & Students in Sweden/ Latvia
- Passport Services
- Police Clearance Certificate
- Surrender of Indian Passport and Renunciation of Indian citizenship'
- Overseas Citizen of India Scheme
-
Consular/Attestation Services
- Important Points
- Payment of Fees for Attestation Services
- Apostille of Documents Issued by Indian Authorities
- Attestation/Legalisation of Documents Issued by Indian Authorities
- Affidavit for Issuance of Passport for Children Born in India
- Attestation of Power of Attorney or Documents from Individuals, Companies and Organizations
- Attestation of Documents Related to Adoption
- Attestation of Documents Issued by Swedish/Latvian Authorities
- Attestation of Photocopies of Documents
- Issue of Life Certificate
- Death Certificate
- Taking Ashes of Deceased Persons to India
- Affidavits Related to Passports
- Affidavit for Driving licence for Indian nationals in Latvia
- Re-Issue of International Driving Permit
- Application Forms
- Book Consular Appointment
- Revised ICWF Fee
- NRI Certificate
- Open House
- Bilateral Relations
- Commerce
- Tourism
- Media Room
- Links
- Contact
- External Affairs
Press Releases
Official Spokesperson's response to queries on the recent media report quoting a Chinese Foreign Ministry statement regarding China’s position on the LAC
September 29, 2020
In response to queries on the recent media report quoting a Chinese Foreign Ministry statement regarding China’s position on the LAC, the Official Spokesperson Shri Anurag Srivastava said:
We have seen a report in the Hindustan Times of 29th September, quoting a Chinese Foreign Ministry statement regarding China’s position on the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in the India-China border areas.
India has never accepted the so-called unilaterally defined 1959 Line of Actual Control (LAC). This position has been consistent and well known, including to the Chinese side.
Furthermore, under their various bilateral agreements including the 1993 Agreement on Maintenance of Peace and Tranquility along the LAC, 1996 Agreement on Confidence Building Measures (CBMs) in the military field, 2005 Protocol on Implementation of CBMs, 2005 Agreement on Political Parameters and Guiding Principles for settlement of the India-China Boundary Question, both India and China have committed to clarification and confirmation of the LAC to reach a common understanding of the alignment of the LAC. In fact, the two sides had engaged in an exercise to clarify and confirm the LAC up to 2003, but this process could not proceed further as the Chinese side did not show a willingness to pursue it.
Therefore, the insistence now of the Chinese side that there is only one LAC is contrary to the solemn commitments made by China in these agreements.
As we have previously made clear, the Indian side has always respected and abided by the LAC. As the Hon’ble Raksha Mantri stated in the Parliament recently, it is the Chinese side which by its attempts to transgress the LAC in various parts of the Western Sector, has tried to unilaterally alter the status quo.
In the last few months, the Chinese side has repeatedly affirmed that the current situation in the border areas should be resolved in accordance with the agreements signed between the two countries. In the agreement reached between External Affairs Minister and his Chinese counterpart on 10th September also, the Chinese side has reiterated its commitment to abide by all the existing agreements.
We therefore expect that the Chinese side will sincerely and faithfully abide by all agreements and understandings in their entirety and refrain from advancing an untenable unilateral interpretation of the LAC
New Delhi
September 29, 2020
We have seen a report in the Hindustan Times of 29th September, quoting a Chinese Foreign Ministry statement regarding China’s position on the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in the India-China border areas.
India has never accepted the so-called unilaterally defined 1959 Line of Actual Control (LAC). This position has been consistent and well known, including to the Chinese side.
Furthermore, under their various bilateral agreements including the 1993 Agreement on Maintenance of Peace and Tranquility along the LAC, 1996 Agreement on Confidence Building Measures (CBMs) in the military field, 2005 Protocol on Implementation of CBMs, 2005 Agreement on Political Parameters and Guiding Principles for settlement of the India-China Boundary Question, both India and China have committed to clarification and confirmation of the LAC to reach a common understanding of the alignment of the LAC. In fact, the two sides had engaged in an exercise to clarify and confirm the LAC up to 2003, but this process could not proceed further as the Chinese side did not show a willingness to pursue it.
Therefore, the insistence now of the Chinese side that there is only one LAC is contrary to the solemn commitments made by China in these agreements.
As we have previously made clear, the Indian side has always respected and abided by the LAC. As the Hon’ble Raksha Mantri stated in the Parliament recently, it is the Chinese side which by its attempts to transgress the LAC in various parts of the Western Sector, has tried to unilaterally alter the status quo.
In the last few months, the Chinese side has repeatedly affirmed that the current situation in the border areas should be resolved in accordance with the agreements signed between the two countries. In the agreement reached between External Affairs Minister and his Chinese counterpart on 10th September also, the Chinese side has reiterated its commitment to abide by all the existing agreements.
We therefore expect that the Chinese side will sincerely and faithfully abide by all agreements and understandings in their entirety and refrain from advancing an untenable unilateral interpretation of the LAC
New Delhi
September 29, 2020